Independent Club Against Corruption

home
crimes vs humanity 1
AU human rights 2
AU law & order 3
AU university 4
dont forget the justice bit
nsw government 6
AU insurance system 7
nsw political culture 8
AU voters 9
nsw organized work 10
links 11
Independent Club Against Corruption

 I C A C

my case

 

 

VESNA REPORTED TO ICAC    OCTOBER 2010

1. REPORT

Name of NSW public sector agency or agencies:

nsw supreme court

Names and positions of public official/s:

Name: Spigelman

Position: NSW Chief Judge

Agency: Supreme Court

 

Private citizens or companies:

Name: sue beach

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Other relevant details: newcastle university

 

 

 

OCTOBER 2010      Newcastle Lord Mayor reported to ICAC

Newcastle councillor Aaron Buman has reported Lord Mayor John Tate to the Independent Commission Against Corruption over a matter involving Queens Wharf

-----------------------------------------------------

YOUR COMMENTS

# And this is corruption? # Why we have to put up with this? # How much this cost? # Can someone disband ICAC? # This is shame # What did you think? ICAC President Mr Ipp was Spigelmans choice # Yeah, the only way to save Spigo is to remain corrupt # Bloody.. we cant move, this man is everywhere; he employs, he discharge, he controls the media, our courts..

------------------------------------------------------

icac@icac.nsw.gov.au  ABOUT ICAC  

# All public inquiries are advertised, with a public hearing notice published on this site and in major newspapers

------------------------------------------------------

# CURRENT INVESTIGATION

# WHY EXPOSING CORRUPTION IS IMPORTANT?

# IF ICAC CANT INVESTIGATE, THAN WHAT

WE'LL FORWARD TO PARLIAMENT

Private citizens or companies:

Name: sue beach

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Other relevant details:

newcastle university

Name: dla phillips fox

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Other relevant details: sydney

Ms Lynch and Mr Martin

Name: ADT / ADB / FC

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Other relevant details:

wednesday OCT 20 2010

ATTENTION ICAC additional information

             TJ Viljoen   Chief Executive Officer of LexisNexis Pacific

Dear Sir

It came to my attention that the two decisions of the Supreme Court judges are published on your website as a legal document. I was the plaintiff and what was published concerns my family and mine reputation. Both of decisions are based on defamation, evidence was excluded by both of judges, Hon J James and Hon Ass J Harrison Both of judges are corrupt and not trustworthy to make statements of such importance. Their corrupt actions forced my older daughter out of country and brought great distress to the rest of my family.I am asking you to remove both of cases from your website and inform me when you do that.  Thankyou, Sincerely Vesna

------------------------------------------------------

OCT 2010

From: Mathur, Shomila (LNG - AUS)
To: Davies, Tamara (LNG - AUS)

Hi Tamara,

The two cases mentioned - Decision of S.C. Judge JAMES  and  S.C. Ass Justice HARRISON - have not been suppressed by the courts and are therefore available on Lawyers Weekly and in our URJ database. These decisions are also available on other free sites i.e. AustLII and Supreme Court of NSW site (Lawlink).

The court notifies us if any judgment needs to be suppressed or should not be published, and we take action immediately. In this instance there hasn't been any notification from the courts about

removal of these two judgments. I do not see the need to remove these judgments from our site, especially as they are available on the official CaseLaw site of NSW. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions.  Thanks, Shomila

------------------------------------------------------

Mr Puplick Mr Rice judge Alsopp and Branson (all of them sacked)

How did you become aware of this matter:

been there, seen that

Summary of matter:

what is your understanding of corruption?

my understanding of corruption?

•lack of integrity or honesty (especially susceptibility to bribery); use of a position of trust for dishonest gain

•moral impairment of virtue and moral principles

•destroying someone's (or some group's) honesty or loyalty; undermining moral integrity;

•inducement (as of a public official) by improper means (as bribery) to violate duty (as by commiting a felony)

(for more info please refer to Hon M Kirby  http://www.hcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj_stjames.htm )

RE - Dear Vesna

Thank you for your email.

             Please refer to the advisement below re your case removal requests.

You will note that the cases are also listed on other Legal websites.

You can contact the following email recipient to follow up this advisement,

although I advise that you would be better to direct your query to the courts,

as LexisNexis is not legally obliged to remove the requested cases.

Shomila.mathur@lexisnexis.com.au

Thank you

Regards, Paul Ditchfield, Customer Service Representative

------------------------------------------------------

 

2. OTHER PEOPLE AND DOCUMENTS  Other people....                                                                                                  

Are you making this complaint on behalf of somebody else?

No

Are there any other people who know about this matter who could assist the ICAC?

Yes

Please provide their name and details.

Name: Paul Sharpless

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Specify how they are involved and how you believe they could assist the ICAC:

http://twitter.com/PaulSharpless

the same concerns as myself

RE;  Dear Paul

Kindly thank you for immediate response. If I'm correct you are saying:

'If the NSW legal system has defame you and published defamatory decision I don’t see why I cant do that?

1) What was published on the NSW legal site is an EVIDENCE of the crime committed, So why would I assist immoral authority to remove evidence I intend to relay on?

2) Evidence of what I am saying is published on my website.  You have been mislead by the NSW legal system and pushed into crime. You were not aware of that. Now you know. I have no intention to neither contact you again nor debate with you.

3) NSW is corrupt state that runs corrupt Chief Judge Spigelman. It is not possible to take. any action in this 'political clime' however I will brought judge Spigelman and the law society of NSW in front of the proper court one day and clear my family name. My family paid a huge price and someone is responsible for that

I am patient person and when I believe in something (and have evidence to prove that) there’s no turning back. Again, kindly thankyou

Sincerely Vesna

ps This conversation will be published on my website

cc Court of Criminal Appeal Hague

Name: Scott Packer

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Specify how they are involved and how you believe they could assist the ICAC: http://new.home.tripod.com/aboriginalstudentaucantprotect.html

Name: Chief judge Spigelman

Street: 

Town / Suburb: 

Post code: 

Telephone: 

Mobile: 

Specify how they are involved and how you believe they could assist the ICAC:

Chief was behind corruption process and is corrupt himself. He can confirm the entire allegation I have made, because he was there and he done that. He is the most senior officer in the NSW legal association and the most respectful - if he confirms that all of this is the truth - I doubt anyone would investigate further (by law - you cant question Chief's professional integrity)

rest of the authorities who can confirm my allegation

-  judge Allsop

-  Judge Branson

-  Mr Bob Debus

-  Mr Barbour

-  Chris Puplick

-  most of NSW Labor Party (former members Mr Iemma and Mr Carr)

Do they know that you are reporting the matter to the ICAC?

No

Documents

Please attach any relevant documents that you may have:

No documents

Explain how these documents support your information.

http://new.home.tripod.com

In addition to any documents you have attached or will provide to the ICAC, do you know of any documents which might be relevant to this matter?

No

3. PERSONAL DETAILS

Name

Title: Ms

First Name: Vesna

Last Name: Simundic

Address

Postcode: 2280

State: NSW

Phone number (mobile): 0404876930

Email: v_e_s_n_a@msn.com

Preferred method of contact: Email

Are you a NSW public official?

No

Consent to disclose my identity?

Not applicable (I do not wish to provide my name and details).

Name

Ok, I did it. As you see things didn’t change. This was my statement handed to ICAC in an email this month and confirmation that they received

ICAC's response was investigation that has nothing with my case Newcastle Lord Mayor reported to ICAC

RESPONSE TO YOUR CONCERNS

We have received so many emails of complains from the first day the ‘Labor Circus’ started and Gillard’s refusal to leave the top office, despite Liberals having enough votes to take over. The rest of the election process (with the spin doctor in charge) went further against PM Gillard’s popularity until she lost respect in the voter’s eyes.

SO WHAT WAS IT THAT PUSHED AUSTRALIAN VOTERS OVER THE EDGE?

 

.1 . THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT PUBLISHED IN DAILY TELEGRAPH

“…Federal Cabinet ‘s blaming NSW Liberals for their narrow election loss as the latest poll count … its all NSW's fault, says Tony Abbott

Liberals didn’t lost NSW election. NSW election process was corrupt. Labor was on the verge of the biggest election - collapse that could only be compared to Howard’s last election. Something had to be done… bring Spin Dr. from UK.. So when we the voters read something like this (whether Mr. Abbott said it or not) we feel that as a great prejudice towards us.

 

 2 .   Ms Gillard’s advice to Mr. Abbott during the PQ time: “To cease the election race; its over “I’ve won” get over it”

Mr. Abbott didn’t lose an election. He is the winner and that’s what will go in history books – whether Labor like it or not. The second thing that the voters wish to put across is – Why someone that we voted for and think he is the best to lead this country should settle with the ‘second best’? He is capable to be the PM, he wants to be the PM and we voted for him to lead this country.

 

 3 .   Even if we ignore all of this above there’s an issue with Mr. Oakeshott. Now when is clear who Mr. Oakeshott is, how the world can expect from Australia to accept his vote as ‘credible’? The man who was in charge of Australia’s future for the next term turned to be corrupts himself. Rest of independents knew about this, so credibility of their votes is seriously questioned.

-   VOTERS STATEMENT (including me) If we ignore the fact that ICAC is the most corrupt agency in NSW the following question should be addressed

1. ICAC  job is to prevent and publiscly tackle corruption.

2. Why ICAC didn’t reveal this information as it was in Australia’s interest?

3.  President of ICAC Mr. Ipp is the former Supreme Court of Criminal Appeal judge and NSW Chief best friend. Voters believe (including me) that he has conflict of interest and cant fulfill job given

4.   As it is obvious that Mr. Oakeshott reputation is not credible-one what ICAC will do and who will investigate ICAC inside-corruption-job?

OK guys it’s published (if this is what you are saying give me 5 if not let us know)

#

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ARTICLE 

HONORABLE M. KIRBY

TACKLING JUDICIAL

CORRUPTION GLOBALLY

If you cant access document pls contact Hon M Kirby

----

TODAY's NEWS

----

FACELESS man response

to victims of crime

----

to voters

----

and to Mr Abbott

Julia Gillard has increased her lead over Tony Abbott as preferred prime minister the latest Newspoll shows

Voter satisfaction for the Opposition leader has fallen dramatically from the last survey, conducted on Sept 10-12, when Mr Abbott had 48 per cent of the vote

GUYS do U believe in this?

YES 11%   NO 89 %

----

----

----

ROB Oakeshott the independent MP pushing for a squeaky clean parliament was investigated by the NSW corruption agency after allegedly forging his wife's signature

500 + Q = answer  We receive many similar questions from different parts of the world. I have noticed that most of you wants to know answers related to certain issue; LAW, COURTS, POLICE, SAFETY, NEW GOVERNMENT, CHANGE (if) ECONOMY etc It would take forever to answer individually so we decided to respond when one question (similar question) reach 500 + emails.

This time it’s going to be interested; instead of me being; I-know-every-answer- which I don’t (you will ask Q and you will respond to Q). I want evidence-based answers. Ok? I’ll help you but the job is shared half you half me. stay tune

-----------------

37 MILL to save NSW LEGAL reputation

OCTOBER 8th 2010    Q FROM BELGIUM

How possible she could take her case through the NSW legal system after

* all what has happened there,

* isn’t she frighten of being defamed by judge Spigelman’s court

* robbed by Ms Greenwood or

* come across legal firm who would act like (DLA) PhillipsFox

VES, WE ARE HERE - COME AND VISIT US

My website highlighted corruption within the NSW court and for sometime Australian legal system is the talk of the town around the world. So it’s about ‘the picture perfect’ for the world to see that judge Spigelman is not corrupt and is happy to give compo to anyone who he let in his court. Off course this legal action was not her idea. 37 Mill for a few inappropriate words, a kiss and affection she never publicly rejected is fantastic compensation considering who’s she against - David Jones!!! Top Guns could wipe her out in any other circumstances BUT its about ruined NSW legal system, its about reputation lost that our NSW Chief Judge Spigelman  desperately try to buy.

In this time where Scott, me, and many more are abused for seeking an apology and a $40.000 for personal injury, defamation, discrimination, victimisation, racism, you name it..  This young lady’s marching in front of the media (why media cover this case??) seeking $37 MILL (why $37MILL??)  Without fear of being labelled as vexatious litigant (how come she is not concern at all – she emerge very focused and every word is carefully stated). And last but not least she choose the Federal Court, that THE SAME COURT where my case, worth millions, was thrown out and I label as vexatious litigant? Where my folder was forward from the Supreme Court despite half of documents missing (again) How come that those txt messages – evidence she relied on- Ms Greenwood didn’t steal and judges didn’t interferer with? Why the media published those confidential txt messages – (who gave them an access?)

But this is a big case, aimed at world audience so you can expect more twists, more media contribution, and when everything’ else is exhausted; appropriate finale will be: ”I was punished because I said NO, its not OK. But today when everything’s finished I can only say; we live in a vibrant democracy and it works. It works well at the most important times when they are put on the test by victims of crime, in our courts without the jury The last few months shows clearly that our courts are VERY just and VERY STRONG INDEED I would conclude with 'one size does not fit all and the Sunshine of 37MIL is the best disinfectant' . Thank you"

It is so raw, so easy to work out what’s going on, but desperate situation requires a desperate measure. I didn’t buy it, and looks me like you didn’t either

----------------

NOW WHEN THIS CASE TOOK A WORLD_WIDE ATTENTION NSW PLEASE EXPLAIN

claim made by the junior publicist KFK against DJ and its former chief executive MMcI is a pretty standard case FC Judge Geoffrey Flick

A big win would be good for its business. A punitive damages award would be particularly good This appears to be a fabulous case for her lawyers, Harmers Workplace Lawyers, to run

The leaks that have found their way to the media are clearly frustrating for a person only interested in adjudicating the law

The motivation of Fraser-Kirk's lawyers is more interesting. There is plenty of commercial gain for this firm in boosting the profile of sexual harassment

In numerous asides the judge has been critical of the media circus

The defendants are a large, well-funded company and its high-profile former chief executive, who has already fallen on his sword for unbecoming conduct, is perfect fodder.

Rather, those who see this as a female David taking on Goliath and a ideological feminist battle are probably missing the point

There are larger forces at play

 

-----------------

 Q FROM KOREA

If the things are the way you described what the people employed

* doing there,

* who pays them to sit there from 9 - 5

* whats their response now?

*        VESSNA YOU ARE WELCOME

------------------------------------------

O, dont even mention. There are changes though, new President who took over from Mr Puplick in 2003, brand new website, beautiful pictures, new people you can talk on a  "confidential basis" ...  before you decide to raise an allegation... But people knows that behind all of this is the same old culture, the same old values. NSW is unlike any other state in Australia. Just take a look at the top authorities who work in NSW Gov. Very rarely you will see someone with "unblamished career" Most of them were involved in some dealings and needed judge Spigelman's help to politicaly survive. So, when it comes to 'do the right thing' or 'join the boys club' ... the choice is clear   

ANTI DICRIMINATION BOARD

-----------------

--------

-----------------

#

election news

#

THE MOST SHAMEFUL SPEECH IN AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL HISTORY followed by the most shameful political wining ENTRY

#

PM by independent choice Ms Gillard thanks everyone but the voters, yeah we didn’t vote for you... but the good manners are good manners

#

ENTRY was so embarrassing, AU media had to cut the winning entry and make new video for the Australian audience Even the name was modified and the emphasis was on the world UNCUT because media did CUT

the beginning of the tape

#

#
#

#

A SMALL DEMONSTRATION OF MISS-LEADERSHIP

#

Oct 07, 2010

# 

When Julia Gillard swore in her ministers only a few weeks ago, it turns out she forgot to give any minister responsibility for higher education or indigenous health.

Since journalists generally don’t seem to like to ask her difficult questions, the error has never really been adequately explained. However, the question should be asked whether this was an isolated oversight, or part of a pattern of incompetence

Mr Oakeshott - whose vote ensured Julia Gillard became Prime Minister was counseled over the fraudulent activity

#

POST-election NEWS

#

Rob Oakeshott lobbied military for donor

# 

Mystery over who made MP ICAC claims

# 

NSW constitutional law expert said it would be "near impossible" for Mr Oakeshott to be prosecuted by the ICAC

#

#

#

#

#