AU human rights 2

crimes vs humanity 1
AU human rights 2
AU law & order 3
AU university 4
dont forget the justice bit
nsw government 6
AU insurance system 7
nsw political culture 8
AU voters 9
nsw organized work 10
links 11
Independent Club Against Corruption



Corrupt 10 out of 10

OUR BEAUTIFUL H R C who never made a single comment about abuse of Scott Parker

Australia Celebrates Increase in Aboriginal Mental Health Awareness "It is essential that the hard work of Aboriginal people in our community incommitted to Aboriginal education  be acknowledged through the Pathways Awards,"


The University of Newcastle is working with the NSW Police and providing support to students following robberies and attacks that have occurred on and near the Callaghan campus recently Acting Vice-Chancellor Prof Kevin McConkey, said the safety of all students and staff was a top priority for the University..

The University has a range of security measures in place We are constantly reviewing and improving our arrangements to provide as safe an environment as possible for our staff and students.'Security patrol across all areas of the campus 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Security are available to escort students and staff around the campus, to the train station or to their homes after dark'

The Uni coordinates its activities through a safety group, with representation from the NSW Police and Newcastle City Council to ensure ongoing management of safety

'I am appalled by these acts on our students I urge students and staff to be mindful of personal security and make use of the security services available' Professor McConkey.

'The University will continue to do all it can to ensure it continues to be a welcoming place. I applaud the response of the NSW Police and University Security to the events that have occurred'

Security Services at Callaghan can be reached on (02) 4921 5729. All emergency calls should be directed to (02) 4921 5888. Professor McConkey is available for interview Contact K Robinson Manager - Media and Public Relations, 0408 115 467.


BEFORE: WILSON R - Judicial Member  Former Newcastle University student Scott raised his concerns to ‘Margaret’, about the legal proceedings in Sydney’s courts. Actions from ADT judicial officer was concerning and the statements given were alarming. I attended 2 Hearings with Scott.

Scott asked ADT for permission to cross-question me in relationship to ‘service’ given to other students. In my presence Scott stated words to the effect:

I need to respond to Uni response. Please may I have Uni’s affidavit available to me?

Judicial Member WILSON R - You can respond without having access to this document.

Scott How can I respond to (her) affidavit if I didn’t read

Judicial Member WILSON R - Just imagine you read it than respond...

I think it’s better if you put in writing what you want to say’

Scott asked ADT to cross-question Ms Beach and was given permission.

Ms Solicitor refused to attend in person

She was about to be cross-question over the phone. 1 minute before this she sent request to ADT and in it, she instructed ADT Judicial Officer to remove me from the Courtroom than Scott would have opportunity to cross-question her. Ms Solicitor request was based on ‘policy’ nobody heard of. So I was removed and Scott was alone with ADT and Law Firm acting on Uni behalf. When Scott emerged from the Courtroom he was greatly upset.

To my best knowledge his statements were: Sue BEACH lied and lied; she didn’t say one correct word Whatever she made up I immediately hand-in to judge evidence that makes her statement defamatory under the oath...  Judge saw everything..  And ignore everything...  What’s the point coming here?


Judicial Member WILSON R    10 minutes prior allocated cross-question time

Ms VS, Uni legal Director Ms Beach asked and was granted that instead of being cross-question by plaintiff, you are asked to provide written statement. You will not be cross-questioned’

VS   ‘Your Honor, thank you for this information. However I need to ask you why didn’t you tell me that yesterday, this request was dealt at yesterdays hearing and Ms Beach and Your Honor made mutual decision . I live in Newcastle; this is the second day that I’m traveling here

Judicial Member WILSON R  ‘Well Ms Beach and I ….

'The court thought…’

'We thought... ‘

‘I think it’s better if you put in writing what you want to say’






Scott was seeking $40.000 in damages, his case is almost identical as mine, and the damages are almost the same (everything supported by evidence) Ms Beach refused to settle and for 2 years she paying different legal firms to ‘extend’ those hearings.Scott s family life had the same destiny as mine: broken relationships


Scott made available medical reports, psychiatrist reports, and any other medical documents to S Court and Uni. Ms Sue Beach used the PEST POLICY in this case and put forward that Scott should be ‘evaluate’ by psychiatrist of Supreme Court and Uni choice The court approved this and Scott was told to attend psychiatrist of their choice who will make 'independent' evaluation Scott was unease about this request; He talked with me early in the morning.  I didn’t see any logic in this and all of us told him not to go

I received phone call that afternoon.  Scott was greatly upset.  He was in extreme distress

Scott attended appointment and was subject to horrible emotional abuse. Psychiatrist behaved in an extremely unprofessional manner, making appointment very stressful and traumatic experience. After 20 minutes psychiatrist suddenly left the room saying: I will terminate this appointment, your behavior is not appropriate’ and left Scott alone in his surgery



Scott was in shock, it took him 10 minutes to come to terms what’s happened, then decide to leave. However psychiatrist had locked the door and Scott inside. who was in state of panic, yelling through the locked door for someone to let him out, but nobody came in rescue He tried to escape through window however once out he realized that psychiatrist had locked all  ‘IN CASE OF EMERGENCY’ doors and he didn’t know what to do. He's got panic attack due to his disability ( post traumatic stress disorder) Than he realized that he had mobile with him, and in it number of the medical center, so he called reception and ask nurse to unlock the door and help him go out, which she did

From: v s
Sent: Saturday, 22 Nov 2008
To - Court of Criminal Appeal HAGUE
Subject: Mr Packer

Dear Sir Madam, I do not expect help from any of you, and I am not asking for myself. However I ask if anyone can HELP this student. He is an Australian and like me very badly treated by University of Newcastle and Sydney's legal system. We are made from different ‘fiber’; he is not as strong as myself. I am concern for him. He will not last. This abuse that was "set-up" by University and court was almost fatal and I feel I can’t assist him anymore, yet to leave him to struggle alone, it’s not in my nature

What I am asking; is it possible for the police officer from any state to provide personal protection whenever he has contact with the court and University?He is intelligent, very gentle soul, about to complete master degree, employed as a teacher. What University did to him resemble to what has been done to me. If I proceeded with hearings it could be me who was abused.

It’s very hard here and I’m not sure do any of you really understand what we are going through? Nobody's safe. Particularly is hard for minorities, I am migrant and Mr. Packer is indigenous Australian. May I encouraged all of you to consider assisting Mr. Packer before its too late. Please Thank you in advance Vesna 

Cc - Premiers Cabinet (NT, ACT, WA, SA, TAS, VIC)



Scott SOLICITOR was a Supreme Court choice working for Student on a pro-bono basis.  After student contacted him complaining about abuse Solicitor told that he would contact University legal and see what has happened.He did so.
SOLICITOR returned the phone call:
“Uni legal Rep and I think that you should have another appointment with new psychiatrist, it’s your responsibility that the appointment has been canceled, looks like they will find someone else.

Scott didn’t feel good about this - found legal firm on his own    

New legal firm, new solicitor – after years of delay - lets start again.  New legal firm informed him that his legal issue has good prospects in the court.  They will take hic case.  They told him that they would contact Supreme Court re; hearings and affidavits and will talk with Uni Legal Rep.


NEW legal firm’s advice: “After talking with Uni legal Unit we think that you should have another appointment with someone else, other psychiatrist, it’s very important to do that."

Scott has all evidence from his own psychiatrist who knows him for years.  I don’t believe that specialist can see you for an hour than provide report to the court that is more valued than the statement from another specialist who knows you for years.  Even if he does that – what he has in front of himself is the product of University abuse, damaged student, abused through the NSW courts, exposed to stress, defamation, and lies.  This doctor will never know who “the student” was before abuse so he won’t know the difference. And our cases are just about that – what has been done – who we were before and who we are today.  The difference is compensation.

SCOTT ASKED FOR ADVICE I am not psychiatrist, so my comments re; his mental health and how Uni abuse affected him is not relevant. Also I am not judge; don’t understand the law and what has to be done.  There was no advice from me

AAP General News (Australia) 11-02-2005

NSW: Chief justice calls for circle sentencing
SYDNEY, Oct 27 AAP - Indigenous Australians, who are grossly over-represented as victims and perpetrators of crime, should be allowed to use circle sentencing because it is a more effective deterrent, NSW's top judge says

Chief Justice James Spigelman said that 14 years after the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, the number of Aborigines in prison continued to climb. Although they comprised just two per cent of the population,…




As I said I can only give you an amateur opinion that should not be taken seriously. I am not professional, I am victim too. However, you asked and I will respond 

I will not provide any support to Scott Nobody will go with him for this new appointment with this new psych. Scott’s health had greatly deteriorated after the last abuse orchestrated by Uni and approved by the Supreme Court. I see him as someone who cannot make reasonable decisions anymore nor act in his own benefit.  I believe that University legal solicitor Ms Sue Beach had destroyed this student until point of no recovery  Her professional neglect, lies, defamation, delays, and ‘do-what-I-want-to-do’ attitude through the court proceedings put an end on Scott’s health I am in no position to advice him However I am in position not to be involved in this crime.


Today is a different matter More and more professionals are dedicated to tell the truth, rather than protect the system like in the past Ms Beach and Ms Beach-alike cant count on medical silence anymore so the Pest Policy statements from their own carefully chosen psychiatrist might be solution to cover future abuse of students.. Scotts  case is in the Supreme Court Sydney. Hearing continues


Scott has further discussion with his ‘legal team’.  This time it is even more optimistic and hopeful. He was told that his case is between 2 and 5 MILL, so for him after all abuse he went through this sounds like heaven. However.. I ask Scott what has to be done now? The documents are complete, compensation was weighted by the court (dare to assume) so what is between Scott and his compensation? He said that some paper-work has to be done, he was told not to worry, that’s simply court process, they cant speed up, that’s the LAW … Scott was in a very good spirit, very optimistic and happy to finally find a legal firm with no connection-what-so-ever with University and the NSW Courts Scott’s case is in the Supreme Court Sydney. Hearing continues

UPDATE APRIL ’09   Yesterday he had another hearing. He had called me to let me know what’s happening Although Scott’s case was hand over to the Supreme Court in late 2007 few things regardless his case are greatly concerns me. Not him, but me.

Ms Solicitor of …..etc, etc..  still didn’t hand over evidence she said she would relay on.

Scott didn’t have hearing in front of the Judge and the Jury despite request being filled to the Registry in appropriate manner and according to the law

Scotts allegation against psychiatrist who abused him was sent to court. Ms Beach never responded accurately nor explained why there’s no response in defence of psychiatrist of her choice. Scott discussed this issue with his legal team and was told that Ms Beach was surprised by his allegation because psychiatrist report was in Scotts benefit.

I asked Scott if all of this took place at the hearing than why the matter can’t proceed in front of jury or be settled by University.

Scott was unhappy about my comment He thought I’m too much into ‘conspiracy theory’ They can’t proceed because Uni didn’t hand in evidence I asked him how he feels about all this delay, but the Scott I knew is not here anymore. From the day he was abused by psychiatrist he is very different person from the student I knew. This Scott is unusually optimistic, the legal case he was so concern in the past suddenly is not issue to be ‘concern about’ He is over-confident with this new legal team (lawyers who are finally on his side, who don’t know any judge from the Sydney’s Court nor have any contact with University)  He is very easily distracted and at times I am not sure he can process all I have said…

Many of you asked me how different he is, what I mean with that and to explain more my concerns. All I can come up with;

Like my younger daughter; when I asked her teacher why her performance is so appalling in school (we did consider all what has happened, we understand the trauma she went through, she knows that both her parents love her unconditionally) so why she can’t move?Her response was: “She lost the ZEST for life, there’s no other explanation, she simply lost that sparkle she was so ‘famous for’

Scotts case is in the Supreme Court Sydney. Hearing continues                                         millions of dollars worth smile 

UPDATE MAY 23  Scott and I talked yesterday. .His case is going very well His legal team stated they will take care of everything, he doesn’t need to attend the Hearings Although in the Supreme Court for 2 years he is told just few days ago that this new legal firm still didn’t handed in all the evidence on his behalf. Now, they have a new theory and that is, "University is not who we will 'go after' We have to find the names of Academics who were in Academic Senate (people responsible for all decisions in relationship with any claim) Scots team believe those people are responsible, not Uni it will take time to find out who they are whether they are still there or are they retired? I asked Scott what he made of this statement and he was impressed. He said that this legal firm works hard; their 'best' barrister and lawyers are involved... The whole team is dedicated to assist him, it might take time but his case is between 2 and 5 MILL...

Scott was informed about psychiatrist report (that is in his benefit) yet he never received the copy. University refuses to respond and he is still denied the right to have the Judge and the Jury trial His case is hanging between different registrars Despite all of this there’s no single concern in Scots behavior

He said that University requested from Court another psychiatrist appointment - this time with his treating doctor who he knows for years. He is ok with that


Scott asked the same but I cant make any statements. I don’t understand legal proceedings, role of the judge, legal process... I can’t make comment about the system I don’t understand. The only thing I can say is; I do not agree with Scots statement that University still refuse to respond. University did respond very clearly.

the HERALD THURSDAY MAY 21st 09  Crisis  draggs UNI $1.4MILL into RED

Uni in RED or not d VC Prof Saunders earns more than the PM KEV747

Like with my legal case, their response was public cry for help Who knows, it worked once maybe it will work again Whenever Uni is in crisis Citizens would donate in fear that if Uni is closed their children might lose only chance to study Everyone can’t afford to send children to distant Uni and they would do everything to make sure that this University survives If that means donations, so be it


I received phone call from Scott who was in a very good spirit What I liked about Scott was his wittiness and brightness to pick up the things between ‘the words’ He was very good in that. You didn’t need to spend hours explaining something – he would understand ‘the issue’ and was able to respond exactly to the problem – he was so good in that.

This Scott is just a shadow of what he was once. Many of you told me; How one appointment could do so much harm? But I know what many of you don’t – because it happened to me – one appointment with the social worker had change my life, ruined my marriage and scared my children for life. It was professional abuse, planed and skilled. Neither Scott nor I stood the chance.

But Scott was so joyful, one more appointment and that’s it, considering that the psychiatrist who abused him wrote the report in Scott’s favor. If new psychiatrist do the same than Uni wouldn’t have grounds to make complains.

I asked him is he concern about seeing someone he doesn’t know?

He laughed and laughed before saying that he didn’t believe how ‘big scary mouse’ I turned into. Than he jumped to another subject about someone he meet few days ago than after 5 min returned to our conversation and asked me; What’s there to be frightened about?  I simply couldn’t wait for all this s…t to be over; if I need to see 10 psychiatrists I wouldn’t mind. Phew, no big deal. He informed me that Ms Beach took his legal team seriously and after 5 years (from court to court) she found legal firm to present University. So those two years in the Supreme Court were not serious enough?” But Scott was gone from this topic, he told me he is about to go out, he has some friends waiting for him and he said he appreciate my interest in this case and thanked me for the phone call. He promised next time he will contact me.

Scott's case is in Supreme Court Sydney from 2007

University still didn’t respond.

Request for judge and the jury is ignored Hearing continues




UPDATE AUGUST 14th  Scott’s appointment with new psychiatrist  Scott had appointment with psychiatrist the Court recommended. This time Scott was not abused. Looks like this time Scott had an expert from psychiatric field. After just 2 hours and one 15 min questionnaire, psychiatrist came up with diagnosis. Lucky Scott. Some patients had to visit psychiatrist for 12 months before diagnosis is established, but this Some people with psychiatric injury are just plain lucky. Lucky Scott. I asked Scott what’s his understanding of his case, what else had to be done before hearing in front of jury takes place? Scott is very confident, everything is in hands of his law firm (with no connection to supreme court whatsoever) he doesn’t need to attend any hearings- they will do that for him. It will cost a fortune... but its worth. There’s a lot of written correspondence between Scott and his legal firm; he sees that as very professional and very expensive, but ...its worth

UPDATE LATE AUGUST Meeting with University  - Everything was set-up to negotiate out of court 'issue'. The day was chosen, papers ready... Than University change its mind

UPDATE EARLY SEPTEMBER   Explanation by Scott’s legal firm   Scott has to find one more document, some policy related to the issue strictly related to duty of care... They cant proceed without it. The only problem was that Uni legal team couldn’t find its own policy. So when it was clear that policy doesn’t exist Scott and his legal team were asked to find it and solve this mystery.  I suggested to Scott that he might use this as further neglect (Uni wanted include the policy - but they couldn’t find...?)  It was too much for Scott... He said he cant deal with all of this...However you call this process.. it continues

Wed SEPT 16  Scotts legal team throw out new idea... They will not take University of Newcastle to Court - they will take everyone individually They will make Sue Beach, Vice Chancellor and rest of them who were involved accountable. It will take more time but its going to be more money. Scott asked how can Sue Beach pay huge bill and his legal firm replied:' Thats her problem, she might sold her house... we dont care" Scott was greatly impressed, particularly this about Sue Beach. He thought its good idea.

SEPT Scott’s called just to let me know that University decided to proceed with the hearing in front of judge. Mediation is not an option, they believe they have the case, what they need is just "proper Supreme Court judge". Although Scott didn’t receive any doctor’s report he was told that psychiatrist report is completed and available to University.

Mon NOV 30 Scott’s had numerous meetings with his legal firm. He can’t explain what’s going on and why his case cant proceed in front of a jury Explanations given are bizarre and all in an effort to show the whole world how powerful NSW Government are. In the mean time people who has nothing to do with this entire crime (but are involved; children, partners, relatives and friends) are punish daily and denied basic rights - criminals from the other hand, people who abuse, steal and defame, not just victims like Scott but this country as well, live in a stable family, without fear. Well, welcome to NSW.



Scott told me he had some problems with this legal firm; they behave strangely. He received number of phone calls from his solicitor and every time its more and more bizarre. He said he feels greatly confused and don’t know what to think. He quickly summarized his concerns. * One phone call was cheering, he was told that the way they sow his case he has a good chance to receive between  $2 and 5 MILL* Next phone call was disappointing; “Scott, Sue Beach has made an offer of 40.000 and if you accept we will charge you only 10.000, so better if consider this. Judge might strike your case or Ms Beach might strike out your request for jury so you don’t stand the chance

* Following day Scott was warned that his case was not handed in yet, so judge is thinking to strike-out the case altogether. When asked why it was not handed yet, reply was: “We are waiting for an overseas professional opinion”

* The next call was disturbing; Conversation started with: We are not sure we can present you anymore… than the lawyer raised his voice, yelled at Scott, and in the same time very rudely force him to answer the question: Have you ever been sexually abused,? As this question was out of blue moon, had no connection with anything that happen in University it took Scott by surprise. He didn’t know what to say which in return angered his lawyer who continues to yell at him saying if he doesn’t admit he will not proceed with the case. Scott was speechless and distressed. His lawyer was verbally insulting, discourteous, insolent and disrespectful. Indigenous Australians do not talk about so deep personal issue with the strangers, let alone over the phone call, when being forced and yell at. Scott was so distressed so I told him to relax a bit, make coffee, and I will wait until he calms down. But Scott was very quite. I asked him how he dealt with such a brutal attack on his privacy and he replied; that he felt abused, violated, and so hopeless. He sound depressed, and said that he doesn’t see any solution, why bother at all with this, its clear that Sue Beach wants my money, maybe I should just quit everything.  It took me an hour to calm him down

. * A few days latter his lawyer told Scott to come to his office to sort out some documents because they don’t have enough staff to do that. To my knowledge Scott refused to help clerical staff with their daily duties. As this was not humiliating enough Scott was invited to attend a meeting where he met the new barrister. He expressed his concern about the legal bills and longevity of his process but the barrister was very optimistic; Scott your case have a good prospects and even better financial outcome”

* The last phone call was from the Supreme Court registry, he was instructed to go over every document to see is everything in order. He was informed that Sue Beach consider to proceed with the hearing and even allow jury to attend the hearing – that’s how confident she feels about his case.


UPDATE MARCH 20th Scott’s phone call



Scott's health is an issue of a great concern. Scott told me that from that incident with psychiatrist when he was abused and humiliated he feels that he’s not "quite" ok. He can’t explain what was what makes him feel so anxious but something’s not right; some strange lumps would appear around his neck, and after a few days it would disappear... than again. Doctors couldn’t explain what it was and why this is happening. The only explanation was 'Might be due to stress, or prolonged legal proceedings'. I ask him what he will do with that issue, how he can help himself than would he bring this to the court attention; further abuse, more damages to claim. It’s clear that was done on purpose with intention to destroy his health and any prospect for compensation. For some reason mediation didn’t take a place .He was concern. We draw comparison between our cases; a lot of money’s involved, the damage is enormous and judge Spigelman would never allow a fair and public hearing in front of a jury. University already owes millions in legal costs, than there’s Scots legal team (Uni will pay that too) they will pay everyone but Scott... when you add costs from previous courts (ADT) …Than there are people who made all of this possible, people within the legal system, they expect some pocket money too.. It’s already between 2 and 4 mill. Like in my case, moneys gone and now they have to get rid of him somehow. With me they opted defamation, I was label as Vexatious Litigant and publicly defamed on Court Website. We believe that in Scott’s case their target is his health. It would suit University that Scott finishes in some mental institution. To remove him in any other way might look suspicious, Hague might decide to open an enquiry...Publicity is not an option. So I think they will get rid of Scott quietly and very soon.

Election is just about the corner. PM Rudd and Ms Gillard, both of aware of this case and did nothing, are in the full swing... PM just last night went publicly in Sydney;’ The right time has come to help our Aboriginal brothers and sisters' to help them to enter the workforce. ' From the day PM publicly apologized until last night Indigenous people were ignored, but now is different story. So we concluded that there’s no magic bullet for his situation and back to basic would be the best approach. To explore his case further would result in political s...t storm.  We are sure that his case wouldn’t finish with a 'fair-shake-of-the-sauce – bottle – mate’. It was clear to both of us that KEV747 doesn’t care what we the f…ers think.

UPDATE APRIL 3th Scott’s phone call

Scott had home-visit from Physiotherapist; my understanding was that it was done on request of Scott’s legal firm.  It came at a very bad time as Scott was so ill, couldn’t do anything, cook, clean, wash… So he had someone to do this for him, on request of Disability Centre or Centrelink. He expressed frustration and feeling of powerless. And again we talked what it means living in the State where there’s no court, nobody to protect you, where criminals like Ms Beach and Ms Lynch can do whatever they want and never faced the consequences or take any responsibility. I told Scott to be brave and not allow Uni to disturb him, annoy or threaten. I also told him that I’m very concern for his well-being. Uni’s attack on Scott in psychiatric appointment was devastating act of cruelty with destructive consequences on his health. I told him that would suit Ms Beach if he gone mad or if he do something to himself….  Scott promised he would never harm himself as that’s against his religion. Despite I didn’t feel ok when our conversation came to end. I am so concern and don’t know how to help my friend


Dear Mr. Mick Gooda

I am writing you about the difficult matter. Scott Packer, an indigenous student, who’s for years in the legal proceedings with Newcastle University. Behavior of University legal director ms Sue Beach is distressing. What Scott received is abuse, discrimination and additional stress on his already fragile health.  Ms Beach is behind all of this with the help of NSW legal system; all of them under the full protection of police.

I support and talk with Scott at least 5 times a week, for the last 4 years and can say that I might have some insight of Ms Beach abusive behavior on his health   I attended ADT hearings on his requests, helped him to prepare affidavits, providing him with the information I thought might assist his court outcome but I cant protect him from Ms Beach. She will use any opportunity to abuse and upset this student just to avoid financial responsibility. I talked with Scott again last night and he was concern; while he was out, Police Officer came to his home asking people who live there about his whereabouts. We couldn’t understand why this is happening however knowing Ms Sue Beach we have grave concerns that this might be orchestrated by her in an effort to push Scott to the limit. I might be wrong about this; it might be an innocent visit maybe an attempt to use Scott to somehow remove my website... however when it comes to University we cant take the risk.

May I ask you please, to support Scott during this interview and to be with him during this meeting?.Or if is appropriate they might have the meeting in your office.  If I have a car I would be there for Scott, nevertheless whatever your decision is PLEASE don’t let Scott to be on his own. Kindly thank you


We received an enormous response, one of concern for Scott’s situation and what can be done. Scott had a few more visits from Police but wasn’t home. He is greatly concern about those visits. Phone call with office on duty didn’t clear the nature of those visits; police officer couldn’t say why those visits took the place. The officer assigned for this case will be back on Friday this week so Scott had made appointment to see him in his office. He is so concern (who wouldn’t be) He shared this concern with his law firm, to see from where all of this is coming from however lawyers responded very wisely; 'We all do strange things under the pressure' than 'Sorry I have to go cant talk any longer' So imagine this response to student who went through so much and was abused by NSW legal system at any opportunity.


Whoever sent police from whatever reason, must know about Scott’s circumstances.  So when Police act so unprofessionally towards someone who’s so honest, decent and good citizen, it makes you wander… how far the service we receive differ from appropriate service for victim of crime.  Ms Lynch, the thief, Ms Beach, pathological liar, Registrar Ms Greenwood who does all of this above, than our Honorable who defame and breach the law on a daily basis would never have this problem. Our law protects criminals and their actions and it went for so long that NSW citizens don’t even expect anything else, they think that’s how it is everywhere in the world


Before the meeteng with police Scott received the phonecall. Police wanted to know does he feels safe? Does he fear for his safety? Scott was grateful for this call but was left unclear why police are asking those questions and didnt find out until the meeteng took place. To Scott's surprise the meeteng was about an old claim that Scott made long ago and has nothing to do with University. Later when we 'went' over the events we couldnt work out why police asked Scott does he feels safe? If the issue was an old claim, as police stated, Scott has never been in danger related to that claim. However, both of us were releived that at least this issue wouldnt bother Scott anymore. With University there were no news, no hearings, no phonecalls.

UPDATE; MAY Scott’scase finished


After all abuse, discrimination and humiliation Scott went through mediation took the place last week. All those millions Scott is entitled to vanished in the thin air. Scott s legal firm requested from him to pay $100.000 for the service provided. Court-fees weren’t mention during the settlement which means that the Chief judge Spigelman did a good job so University paid the fortune to the Supreme Court. How much Scott received? Well, he is victim of crime, Aboriginal Australian with disability, person that the media were told to ignore, in mercy of the corrupt Supreme Court judge Spigelman and in hands of Ms Sue Beach. What chance he had? He told me that he signed the statement that prevents him to disclose settlement issue with the third party, so he couldn’t tell me how much was stolen from him. He said that he couldn’t fight the 'system' any longer, his lawyers, the court, and the University. He was ready to settle for $100 that’s how exhausted and abused he was. And as always, cases like Scott’s, Paul’s and mine can’t be published; people are left in the dark re; how our justice works. From the other side Ms Mercedes Corby's case was not delayed, she had all the judges, barristers and lawyers available to pursue 'the justice' and the media made sure that Australia knows how law-breakers (and their families) are rewarded in Sydney's courts

UPDATE; JUNE 23rd University delays with the payments

Although the case was finalised some time ago, University still didn’t deposit money on Scott’s account. Many of you ask why is this happening; considering that they succeeded to delay his case and take almost all what Scott ‘s entitled to receive? They delay with the payment because they can and there’s nobody above to give them a feedback. Media is silent, as always and with that they protect crime and corruption so NSW citizens have no idea who is Judge Spigelman and how he serves the most vulnerable.

UPDATE; JUNE 26th payment received

So, now when Scott’s received compensation, where he’s in his life? Uni with an enormous help of NSW Government, legal system and off course Chief judge Spigelman; have destroyed Scott until point of no recovery. The money given cant even by him a house to make sure that he doesn’t finish on the street. His relationships failed, one after other, as his partners couldn’t live with constant intrusion from University and years of delays by the legal system. His case will never see newspapers headlines so Australia has no idea what is going on behind the walls in the Supreme Court nor how University abuses trust given by parents across the country. Mr. Rudd’s apology to Indigenous australians was just that; an apology, empty words with no meaning. And Indigenous people, rightly owners of this country mistreated for 200 years by us, the settlers, are happy even with an empty “We are Sorry” They were and are treated so badly that those people think they didn’t deserve any better. For some like Scott who dare to question the status quo, the SILENCE from the Hague and Unicef is crystal clear: If is wrong we would interferer – but we don’t, so that’s how it is.

UPDATE; JULY 16th new evidence

Yes, students, lecturers, academics, etc are coming out more often than ever before, with more evidence about Newcastle University re; the years of abuse they endure in the hands of the last institution where crime of this kind should happen. Media? I can’t explain myself. The media is a huge mystery to all of us. Why this case went public? Why Scott’s, Paul’s and mine cant be mention at any level of media. Your suggestion that Scott is indigenous, Paul is gay and I am migrant as a possible explanation… Don’t know, it would be too simple explanation.

About me being migrant; I’m not a migrant – I’m Australian with bad English expression. Australian people accepted me with exception of NSW Government, and the Federal Government, those top guns hate my moral fiber, but I don’t like them as well so we are even.

--     --    
------ --     ------ --     ------
--     --    
------ --     ------ --     ------

Yes I said

Now I will give

myself liberty

to "unsaid"



The search for somewhere to dump Australia's low level radioactive waste has been going on for more that 25 years

That search has frustrated federal and state government, and eventually led to a site being nominated at Muckaty Station near Tennant Creek in the Northern Territory