NSW GOVERNMENT 9

Social Workers
SOCIAL WORK 1
NSW LABOR - COURT 2
LIANE FLYNN 3
SPIGELMAN YEARS 4
JO GAHA 5
THE DAMAGE 6
ABUSE OF LAW 7
OUR FEARS 8
NSW GOVERNMENT 9
UPDATE 11/1/2016
PUPLICK - RICE 11
VICTIM OF CRIME 12
16 June 2016
I HAD TO DEAL WITH THIS?

OUR HONORABLE  LAWBRAKERS /

DESPITE THIS WEBSITE AND ALL THE EVIDENCE THIS AUTHORITY HAS ACCESS TO, ON HIS WEBSITE YOU WONT FIND A SINGLE LAWYER I RAISED ALLEGATION AGAINST
Our vision
* We want to lead in the development of an ethical legal services market which is fair, accessible and responsive.
Our mission
* To improve consumer satisfaction with legal services through:
* Developing and maintaining effective complaint handling processes
* Promoting compliance with high professional and ethical standards
* Encouraging an improved consumer focus within the profession to reduce causes for complaint
* Promoting realistic community expectations of the legal system
Our values
* Fairness * Accessibility * Reliability * Problem solving
* Education * Teamwork * Social justice * Reform * Empathy

Mr Steve Mark was appointed

as the first Legal Services

Commissioner 17 years ago

and he continues in this role

today. Highly unpopular

and the last person in NSW

anyone would ask for advice

Mr Steve Mark victims are in 'every corner' of NSW. His neglect left devastating effects on so many families including mine. We believe that he is there to cover the crime and corruption. NSW would highly benefit if this position is 'disbanded' and Mr. Smith sacked. He's doing nothing and its making a lot of money... just doing nothing. This is one of so many tweets 'dedicated' to

1 #nswpol I have nothing to lose as I have no assets and very little money but I will expose this corrupt council and continue to fight

2 #nswpol @MrGrahamLister @barryofarrell Dear Bazza, its war! Corrupt #OLSC Steve Mark and now a corrupt local council where liars rule

3 #nswpol 17 yrs taxpayers waste MT @FixNSWLegal Both NSW Libs @barryofarrell + @NSWLabor policy, keep Steve Mark #OLSC inept corrupt

My legal case reflects 16 years of NSW Labor Government, NSW legal system and how it worked, how victims were treated - in one word - mentality of the law and the order under Labor Government in Sydney

"The truth is the people of NSW, who entrusted us with government for 16 years, did not leave us, we left them" Keneally

NSW Chief

About University

All those people below, are victims of Newcastle University, as much as I am. I do not believe that University can ever reimburse the damage, ruin reputation and shame those Authorities are going to face till rest of their lives. University has no intention to stop and that’s exactly culture I came to know and that is how I will remember Newcastle Uni. Its all about THEM, nobody else exist, even University reputation means nothing; what rest of Australia thinks means nothing, rest of the world and finally their own students, to people who works there that holds no value

about nsw criminals

The statement for the media?

Tough one. I will not evaluate or scrutinize but need to say the most fascinating thing I’m still coming to terms with; is the process after the crime has been exposed. The moment you breach the law you are in the care of NSW Gov. You are entitled to best legal defendant Judge can find for you You are moved to a better job though quietly, not to upset community Your criminal activity will be “immediately forward” to respectful Mr. NSW OMBUDSMAN who will immediately undertake thorough investigation. When he is satisfied that the crime has been done – your matter urgently goes in the hand of HON Mr. BOB DEBUS, man with wealth of experience and “unblemished career” Mr. Debus will go over your case than locked in his cabinet never to be released The bigger the crime – “NO COMMENT” is more likely you’ll get. If public pressure mountains than the language used is not English, its sophisticated political statement – that a ‘average Joe’ cant understand. Most likely:”Due to cultural barriers … or Due to conflict of interest... or To protect privacy of the victim… Att Gen had refused to comment. Tragic to say but its so good to breach the law in NSW and join the criminals

about nsw citizens

About NSW VICTIMS OF CRIME, DECENT PEOPLE AND HARDWORKING? Don’t ask. . Everyone (and I MEAN everyone) who is there to provide help, advice, to protect you, tell you your rights, give you referralsuddenly disappear.

whistleblower

Those people are gone from the system - they simply evaporate. What they leave behind: is I cant give you an advice, I cant tell you what to do, I cant tell you your citizens rights, I cant assist you financially, This is crime…I do not have jurisdiction to deal with your case…By the way you do not have the case. Some of us who survive this rejection are confronted with the worst – to be forced to witness how those judges, premiers, lawyers and the rest of NSW Government goes after your families and your children until the whole family is destroyed… Even that comes with that 'little extra' For all this time I have never seen remorse, nor willingness to correct what they did. What I have seen was absolute joy in the face of those people, some kind of narcissism, and sort of pleasure that grew bigger. Tragic to say, in NSW it’s deadly to be decent citizen or a victim of crime

Q for VS WHY THIS ADVICE?
If you blow the whistle you might face the consequences like I did That’s why advice above is there. Q ANY REGRETS Never. I don’t have regrets. What's happened to me is a warning... and thats how organized crime wors. On fear. If all of us keep silent; crime, corruption and abuse will never stop. But I cant to give you advice nor tell you what to do. I make my own decisions, so you make yours.

SOCIAL WORKER LIANE FLYNN
JOB Ms Flynn 'left' University somewhere round the time when I did. Before she left she threaten all of us with:" Yes, I decide to leave University BUT I will concentrate on students on placement, supervision" She works in DOCS in Charlestown and Gosford, NSW.
SHE ENJOY IN... Unlike Chris Puplick who changed his 'job nature' Ms Flynn could not give up her pleasure. True to her words she still terrorizes students on placement around Central Coast. However EVERY single student knows about this website and refuses to close the door when alone with her. If state will not protect us - we will protect ourselves. Thats why the STUDENT Organization was established Despite, she does what she loves and why not? The LAW and the system of NSW are on her side
I WILL REMEMBER HER - I thought I cant make mistake. RECOMMENDATION - SHOULD BE KEPT IN ISOLATION
You cant blame one man for all wrongdoings thats going on with our Government but we have noticed many changes after PM Rudd introduced his new Government and Hon Debus as his Minister for Home Affairs. One of changes was Ms Flynn comeback to Australian Association of social workers. If NSW law works as it should work, this lecturer would cost AASW millions and millions in compensation. University and Australia had paid her service to students with their professional credibility and NSW legal body with its reputation. Yet shes back, guess thats how it worked once in NSW and now thats how it works on federal level. WHERE U CAN FIND HER? She is in DOCS EXECUTIVE. Someone asked me once, what I think How much damage this woman can do now when she is 'out' in community? Provided that she's not forcibly stopped, she can do anything at all. Before you give so important job like Child Protection in the hands of someone who abused more students than entire Department of Social Work, the sky is the limit. Imagine how much damage she can do to children who cant protect themselves, who cant make website, who cant complain to HAGUE or Human Rights? The most disadvantaged are in the hands of this woman and NSW and Federal Government protects her. It makes one think Why is that? Who benefit from this silence? Can this woman really protect the child or she is there because she knows and THEY know that she CAN NOT. More about Ms Flynn? Up, close and personal...? google DOCS
and Ms Flynn name.

No matter how many times I have seen criminals being jailed and received 'what they deserve' I am still taken by their last words
Criminals who did serious breach of law, those people make remarkable statements There’s always something grandiose to say at the end, in an effort to maintain their innocence Jo Gaha is not an exception Before she left Uni at her last tutorial with us she stated: "Well, sometimes you have to do what is expected from you - not necessarily what is right”
There you go. This almost outweighs the famous one "The truth is stand alone defence" This was something that would justify all the pain my children went through, my marriage break-up, ruin future... You name it. Well... The life is made up of choices. With every choice come the consequence Because of that I guess the Courts are made to restore the balance. U do the Crime - U serve the time. (like everywhere else in the world, but NSW) JO GAHA IS SMART WOMAN. SHE KNEW HER CARIER WAS FINISHED IN NEWCASTLE, SHE KNEW WHAT SHE DID AND THE PERSON SHE TRIED TO PROTECT (FLYNN) WASN'T WORTH SO SHE 'left' University of Newcastle, and resign as a President of Australian Ass of Social Workers and moved to another state; ACT. NEW BEGINING, NEW LIFE, NEW PEOPLE WHO DOESNT KNOW HER NOR THE CRIMES SHE COMITTED. She works in Canberra, Centrelink, financially she didn’t suffer nor her standard was changed. She did the crime - will not serve the time. REMINISCENCE AASW Code of Ethics. Mr Debus comeback meant Jo was free to return to AASW as well as Ms Flynn. And she did. Lucky girl. UPDATE APRIL 2011 Ms GAHA works in CENTRELINK in ACT and try to make as much as possible friends in Canberra and around Parliament House. the LABOR party was very nice to her, all the crimes she has done and everything else Labor Party is covering. NSW Labor lost election, MPs are coming and going, reputations are ruined... Even the PM Gillard is affected by this cover up, everyone... except UNI of Newcastle and the staff responsible. Guys, have no idea how much you paid and to whom but I SALUTE

Ms SOLICITOR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NSW
JOB Ms Sue Mary Beach worked as University Solicitor till Dec. 2010 My case made her extremely 'infamous', so she (like DLA Fox-guys) change the title to make it harder to find her on Uni website She was University Solicitor up to Supreme Court scandal. Than, legal council.. Than legal Director.. Than Director of Legal Unit... than Uni Legal Adviser.. Than when everything failed she had settle with University Legal Council. Phew!. My case brought a lot of trouble as it turn to be that University bill was 3 X more than the compensation I was seeking. On top of that nobody will ever now how much NSW Government had received for their part in this scandal. I have heard that Ms Beach was very generous. Why NOT? It’s not her money, its mine UPDATE 2011 / allegation after allegation - even corrupt Uni couldnt take it any more It was clear that her crimes went out of control, forging signature of lawyers working for her? By the end Ms Solicitor of the Supreme Court of NSW totally lost it.
RECOMMENDATION: SHOULD BE KEPT IN ISOLATION
ms_solicitor_forged_signature.jpg
HER PASSION I have always saw Ms Solicitor as a unique person. I can’t help than think about her as a very gifted individual. I have seen so many people caught in lie, so many people lying but Ms Solicitor - she beats everybody. The moment you ask her something her first word is: WELL than she starts; lie after lie after lie Dear, she is the Queen of lies. I am simply fascinated by this woman, can’t stop talking about her. Of all the criminals I came in contact she is my favorite. She can lie and look strait in your eyes - without blinking. This is gift, she is blessed. She has style, posture, she is educated, her clothes reflects woman with sophisticated taste.... Unbelievable! I firmly believe that this woman is not 'used' to her true potential. If she lives in Chicago - time-frame-1930 in the era of MAFIA I don’t have any problem imagine her being Ms Solicitor for the 'Corlleone family' (The Godfather movie with Marlon Brando)
PERSONAL My legal matter had a huge impact on Ms Solicitor. She is a little weird those days. Ms Beach is all the time behind close doors, she suffers from nightmares and the Court Hearings are possible ONLY by phone conference. Who ever comes to see her - she is talking through the closed door and security is all the time 'on guard'. There’s more rumors about her health
WHERE YOU CAN SEE HER? You can see Ms Solicitor in action indeed I have watched a movie years ago and the leading actress reminds me so much of Ms Beach, like her twin sisters. Not by looks but by her 'verbal talents'. Want to see Ms Beach in action? - THE HOUSE SITTER with Goldie Hawn in the leading role
REMINISCENCE Do you know who I am? I am Solicitor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales ! ( phew )
WHY SHE LOST THE CASE?
I am often asked this. Why? I think Ms Solicitor had taken my case too lightly
BREAKING NEWS
I guess the last allegation to ICAC was too much for everyone involved. She was to dangerous to be kept any longer. But she can lie, steal, defame.. Skills highly valued within NSW legal system.
She will finish in some court as a Registrar or Ass Judge. She has skill, style..
That’s how NSW system work ;)

BOB CARR
NSW PREMIER
We loved him. Even now, you cannot say a bad word about Mr. Carr without being confronted with some of his admirers. No matter what my tone was in the letter I have sent to him he would always reply with some kind words. Every student who complained to him had the same opinion. Like current Premier Iemma, Mr. Carr was powerful but he didn't know that. We think that we have helped him to step down. Last few months of his leadership we would send him letter seeking Att Gen resignation, blaming Mr. Bob Debus for what is going on with students in Newcastle Uni. We told him if he cannot work with Mr. Debus he should replace him. Mr. Carr took this very serious but Mr. Debus wouldn’t go anywhere. So, our Premier made his decision. WE SALUTE HOWEVER - Mr Carr didn’t investigate, prevent, made public nor help ANY single abused STUDENT though he helped Ms Solicitor... almost change all the policies related to systematic abuse. Sorry Mr Carr, the statement WE SALUTE had to be taken away
REMINISCENCE IF MY GOVERNMENT BREACH THE LAW - WE WILL NOT BREACH THE LAW ( ay, what about that? To this day I still can’t work out; is HE really naive or is HE playing hard?)

HON. MR, BOB DEBUS
Mr DEBUS was Att Gen and his job was to examine complain lodged and on the basis of evidence included to protect my family and me. At that time I could not accept the simple truth that this man was responsible for everything that went on in ADB, ADT, Supreme Court and the Federal Court. The way legal Institutions act - they acton his instructions. I blamed everyone else more than Mr Debus - because we have never met, we didn’t have any legal contact yet I finally can say that I was victim of this Authority and his decision was to let the legal system to destroy my family and me. Everyone asked me WHY he would do such a thing?
Why he would let victim of crime and her two children to be abused for so long. His one word could stop all this crime and yet he refuses to do his job. Now from distance, I THINK that he is part of NSW legal corruption and the money was the motive. Why he enjoyed knowing that my two small children were suffering so much pain, why he NEVER protected two of them...? I can’t understand what his was thinking. If Genie from the bottle appears and I had one wish - it would be to meet this man in person and ask him how the child suffering could make anyone happy.
INTERNAL "I assert that the performance of the courts in NSW is overall the best in the country"
EXTERNAL THE reputation of Australian courts has slipped and its position as a bastion of free speech and human rights has eroded in recent times. Human Rights Campaigner, prominent international barrister Geoffrey Robertson.
CUSTOMERS / VICTIMS OF CRIME / EVERYONE I TALKED TO not to be trusted
REMINISCENCE (after ADT Judge Mr. Simon Rice published defamation) THE TRUTH is stand-alone defence
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 16.3
The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state.

Sharing my experience with other students from Newcastle Uni we came to conclusion that Mr BARBOUR's part in this corruption is cruical. He would 'deal' with y our case for years, particularly if you have psychological injury, in hope that your health will deteriorate to the point that in the end you will not know what was your complain about or most likely you will forget about complain all-together. Than why go to him at first place at all? Well .. . everyone will recommend Ombudsman, on his website is description of what he (suppose) has to do when you lodge complain. The words used are: RESPECT, PATIENCE, CONSULTATION, UNDERSTANDING . . . Only when you fall for that and knock on his door you will realise in a matter of days who he really is, what his values really are and how crucial his neglect towards your case is. I see Mr Barbour as an Authority who simply refuses to do his job and someone who is 100% detached with what victims need and feel. As one of his customer (former Newcastle Uni student) said: "I have always thought that this job is too hard for him" To me, personally, his service was below anything I would expect from someone of his stature. His negligent act towards my matter goes hand in hand with Mr Puplick service
INNOVATIVE THINKING MR BARBOUR DID SOMETHING THAT NOBODY IN THE NSW HISTORY DID BEFORE HIM. HE JOINED HIS FRIENDS AND INTRODUCED THE NEW WAY HOW TO 'DEAL' WITH NSW PESTS (VICTIMS LIKE MYSELF)
Mr Barbour is so corrupt its embarrassing .
RESPONSE TO THIS THAT IS PUBLISHED ON HIS WEBSITE WAS ONE OF FEAR, DISBELIEF AND ANGER TOWARDS THE AUTHORITY WHO FAILED TO PROTECT SO MANY OF US
Reminiscence. Asked by the media to describe himself Mr. Barbour responded Committed to the Truth NOT TO BE TRUSTED

U ASK? What is obvious is that Mr. Puplick aged in unusual way. With age we are getting gray, Mr. Puplick surprisingly went from blonde to black. Does it suit him?
wikipedia
Mr Puplick was never asked to 'Please Explain' and after being sacked from ADB he moved to Uni of Woloongoong to teach our children about human rights and justice
Guys please; your sense of humor is like Ms Beach’s. I can’t discuss Mr. Puplick personal issues so publicly… Below is one of many heart-breaking speeches that left audience deeply moved (70% knew what he did to me) "Former Liberal Senator Chris Puplick takes a critical look at how we deal with the mentally ill in our society. People with mental illnesses are often incarcerated instead of given proper mental health treatment. As one example he cites the case of..." It is imperative that while we undertake the major reforms required to respond adequately to the real needs of the mentally ill in Australia we pay proper attention to those sufferers from mental health problems to whom our only response to date has been incarceration In short it will require politicians to be courageous, so I for one won’t be holding my breath When it comes to my case - Mr. Puplick was holding his breath for 3 long years We all thought he would suffocate
Thanks to the Student Organization formed after I publish this website - every new generations of students will know THE TRUTH about my experience and Mr. Puplick attitude towards people with disability
PROBLEMS WITH LINKS - THIS ONE WORKS ALL THE TIME ADVICE? NOT TO BE TRUSTED
RESPONSIBILITY nobody ever asked, investigate or contact my family and me re; abuse from ADB
JOB Mr. Puplick was well cared for He works at the University of Wollongong NSW, as a lecturer
•REMINISCENCE In 2000 I asked "when Ms Beach intend to respond?" THREE years later (in the mid 2003) the President of the Antidiscrimination Board replied "Honestly, I have no idea"
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS -
Mr. Puplick breached every single policy related to my case 8 Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

JUSTICE Mr SIMON RICE / DPP President Mr. Cowdroy QC / ICAC’s QC Mr. Cripps

FORMER ADT JUDICIAL MEMBER Mr. SIMON RICE
Like many involved in my case Mr. Simon Rice was moved from one job to another That's how NSW Gov deals with mistake of this nature Something has to be done, company had to cover wrongdoing. Victims have to see at least some satisfaction. Some says that after years of 'doing something else' he is back to ADT to serve disadvantaged and discriminated, the way he served me. He did pretty good job with my case; 18 months delay, than published defamatory statement, allow Ms Beach to respond with defamation and the court to accept this defamation as 'accurate' and finally email Ms Beach on regular basis to discuss my case. Honorable Mr. Rice - job well done

RESPONSIBILITY. No one ever asked, investigate or contact my family and me re; service from Mr. Rice

WHERE YOU CAN SEE HIM? Mr. Simon is senior lecturer is law at Macquarie University in Sydney, than he moved to Canberra Uni than there is some rumors he will be back to ADT!!!! That’s not all: He can’t help - but help! Human rights, access to Justice, discrimination ... He is still very passionate about those issues
UPDATE Mr. Simon relocate again a few years ago. This time he moved a little further. He works at ANU COLLEGE OF LAW. He is also Director, Law Reform & Social Justice. After he left ADT in shame, Mr Simon has practiced extensively in poverty law Nobody will never know how many people he made homeless due to professional neglect. I know that his corrupt action damaged my family forever. AWARDS In 2002 Mr. Rice was awarded a Medal in the Order of Australia for legal service to the socially and economically disadvantaged. TRAGIC

Puplick referred for charges Oct 30, 03 By Nick O'Malley

THE ROLE OF ICAC and D.P.P. IN COVER-UP and CORRUPTION

The role of DPP President Mr. Cowdroy QC and ICAC’s QC Mr. Cripps is essential. Mr. Puplick crimes fail into criminal category and everywhere else he would be prosecuted and sent to jail.

Victim would be compensated and family, (most likely than not) might be saved. But this is NSW and it’s not the way labor-system works, despite the fact that my allegation vs University of Newcastle was not isolated case.

* DPP had refused to investigate my case, so there were no charges.

* NSW Omby Mr. Barbour had put me on the blocker list, and his best-Mate the

* Comm Omby replied in foreign language I couldn’t understand than later confirmed in English what I knew all along

* Att Gen Hon Bob Debus would help but he didn’t have jurisdiction to investigate my case

* Mr. Rice had already defamed me and lied in his report published on ADT-website (when I complained to President of ADT Judge Connor, , Mr. Rice was advised to remove the long-version and replace with one-page decision - even this summary wasn’t correct). As this act was clear example of corruption and organized crime vs migrant woman with disability, ICAC was the most appropriate place to lodge complain.

The golden boy, former ICAC comm. Mr. Cripps QC was famous for mixing ‘Corruption’ with Incompetence so Mr Puplick's crime Mr Cripps has seen as incompetent but not corrupt, and my case was dismissed. To protect my privacy the following statement was given to media: The former head of the Anti-Discrimination Board, Chris Puplick, could face criminal charges for allegedly helping a Bunny lodge a complaint with the board and withholding evidence from the NSW Ombudsman. The Omby, Mr. Barbour, referred Mr. Puplick to the DofPP and the ICAC, according to his annual report; it outlines allegations that Mr. Puplick helped Bunny file a breach of privacy complaint against his employer

* Mr Puplick could not be contacted

* Mr Barbour was unavailable

* Mr Debus couldn’t breach confidentiality

* Mr. Rice was concern for my reputation… and refuse to issue the statement for media, let alone to comment why allegation against Mr Puplick was rejected and possibility of compensation (lodged on time) was ignored

* Mr. Cowdroy in the company of Supreme Court judges went to a meeting where the participants were thought how to use guns, in case of self-defence, so he couldn’t be reached... and the rest of NSW acted the same

PHILLIPS FOX turned into DLA PHILLIPS FOX - MS LYNCH turned into MONICA GRACE

Ms Lynch was unique figure in her own way. I had never met her in person. She would send her people to court on her behalf to debate with me - in the meantime she was in charge of written correspondence. My job would be to cut and paste what she had written against evidence I include in my email to her..... And she would be quite for few months. Than again, new issue is thrown by email, I would respond logically seeking response against each of my comments..... And again she would be quite for a while. And that went for two years. Never proper response - despite her having access to every document in the registry without court order (but with court knowledge) Her best friend is Ms Greenwood Supreme Court Principal Registrar (who is far more sophisticated thief) Two of them would visit Registry at night hours stealing my documents, rewriting and in general having lot of fun.

WHAT WENT WRONG? Well, the right question would be what went right? Nothing! However many things raise serious concerns (stealing, lying, tampering, rewriting documents... one can get headache just to think about it) but I was nice to her and had a lot of patience for her... Although my job was to take care of myself I couldn’t not to notice that MS Lynch had some serious problems. Whenever I noticed that she stole some documents I would make new copies and personally deliver to Phillips Fox) and didn’t want raise alarm to Phillips Fox senior officers immediately.. But she was difficult. I found her to be very stubborn in her thinking and perception. One of her biggest flops was that she had a very low opinion about migrant women, with disability and English as a second language…. I have try hard to explain to this 'accredited LAW specialist' that I'm not an average person with disability, and let her know that I will tolerate things up to certain level, but not more. Looks like she didn’t get it I did a lot of research about who 'The Board' is who the Fox Directors are and I had a pretty good profile of each of them and knew what to expect from those clever people. Yet it took me a long time to sit and put in writing allegation against her - back up with evidence that couldn’t be ignored. I knew what will happen, didn’t feel good about myself doing that - but didn’t have choice. Mr. HAYDEN and Ms LYNCH had’ left' DLA Phillips Fox not long after that. WHERE YOU CAN SEE Ms Lynch? Don’t worry 'bout her she'll not finish on social security She has very powerful friend on a very powerful position; Hon Mr Bob Debus. 

HOW WILL I REMEMBER HER? I have never though I will come to situation to seek Violence Restraining Other VS Phillips-Fox and Ms Lynch

Lynch, Rebecca Monica Grace Herbert Geer the firm

2010 BREAKING NEWS Like all her counterparts she has moved from one job to another As my allegation against her went to Judge Spigelman and he is the Chief Judge of NSW no further action will be taken against her. I guess that in Chief Judge's eyes she didn’t do anything wrong; a little bit of stealing, tampering with evidence, People go to jail for far minor offences, but not in NSW. Like her legal firm that went from Fox to DLA Fox Ms lynch did the same, she changed her name She is now REBECCA MONICA GRACE  rlynch@herbertgeer.com.au

Sacked Lawyer moved to new legal firm

MARTIN HAYDEN SAMUEL  JOB although in his early 30is Mr. Martin was forced to retire. He was one of the nicest people I came across and for that matter not sure that Fox were ever-appropriate place for him. I don’t believe that being a lawyer means you have to choose Ms Beach's path; one of crime and defamation I know (though not many) lawyers who are decent and do their job properly - but those people work hard, and you cant beat them in the court There is only one way, or you going down the easiest road that in the end caught up with you when you least expect. WHERE U CAN SEE HIM? I wouldn’t worry about him. NSW Government has never failed
any of its gang members. He will keep 'low' for a while than emerge in another legal firm or even in the court somewhere... His friends are powerful Reminiscence... In '04 I told him 'Between you an me I think Supreme Court is corrupt' In '05' his response was 'I love talking to you about everything else except the Supreme Court' NEWS UPDATE 2010 And as I said our Hayden Martin had emerged in another law firm, never faced the consequences of what he did to my family and me (not he but his legal firm) Unlike his sacked pal REBECCA MONICA GRACE he choose name less fancy... so he is now MARTIN HAYDEN SAMUEL .. phew

FORMER FOX COUNSEL/BARRISTER Mr. Robert GLEESON

I liked his manners - no matter what happened in the courtroom, he was always very polite towards me. No matter what has been said, and a lot of things has been said.. I have never heard Counsel being verbally amateurish. I guess Counsellor was professional and I was not - which means that Honourable Judge Moore was right ... and I was not.  ...and another thing DLA PHILLIPS FOX SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN MY CASE AT ALL DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST  Although this breach of law had happen in the court of NSW Chief Judge Spigelman none of his Judges ever responded to my complain about this breach of law NOT TO BE TRUSTED

NSW LAW ORDER

DLA PHILLIPSFOX / LAWBRAKERS /

Mr. ROBERT CRITTENDEN

Mr. Crittenden is known for his innovative thinking drafting statement like this

If he takes your case you need International help He is also known as the Fox best-kept-secret has acted in many high profile liability and insurance cases, large injury claims arising from failure to act appropriately The case that shoot Mr. Crittenden to fame was VS v University of Newcastle - arising from major University disaster, systematic abuse of students, defamation, and failure in the duty of care When everything else failed, than HE is the ONE. After almost 2 years of Foxes running around the bush, trying to win this case Mr Crittenden was sent to save the day. I'm told that he enjoys reputation of a 'top' accredited solicitor, always knows what he is talking about and X-question skills are his area of expertise - Well welcome Bert. Mr. Crittenden s clients are: Ms Solicitor of the etc, etc , , , Newcastle University, clients willing to pay top $$$$, huge companies and everything and everyone else related to hopeless victims, huge breach of law & duty of care; particularly the need to protect rich corporation where crime and neglect r daily served Mr. Crittenden has many years of experience drafting statement like this particularly when deals with woman affected by mental illness, financially disadvantaged and the cases that by common sense can’t be won Despite all - I have seen a nice side in him, human side; he knows what I'm talking about. For that thank you.... And my girls . . . went crazy. At least 60 of them told me that he is the 'cutest legal thing' ever seen on Internet. There you go Mr. Crittenden If you just didn’t run away from the cross-questioning, I have some feeling we would have 'legal debate' to remember (off course you would win, you had judges on your side, remember?) WE SALUTE Reminiscence... offer of compromise  NOW about the DLA Phillips Fox best-kept-secret Some say that Mr. Crittenden left Fox somewhere around the same time when Mr STRAHL The reason given was the same; Piper couldn’t accept that the smart lawyer didn’t 'sort-out' this case privately. Some cases are not to be brought to court. In every country those cases are matter of mediation  ps what I see will happen here in NSW is the strategy of "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT" and the "PEST POLICY" are going to be widely used (and abused) Cases like mine (millions-$$$) will never see the Court-Light. Victims like me will be rejected before they enter the Supreme Court. This will encourage criminals to treat victims anyway they like

 

Mr. JOHN STRAHL

 FORMER FOX CHAIRMAN ACC LAW SPECIALIST

Mr. STRAHL (NZ office) did something that makes him in my eyes a very honorable man. Mr. Hayden an Ms Lynch were sacked, my emails of complains were never put on the blocker list. HE was an epitome of a pure professionalism As this site became popular and visited by people around the world more and more often the tips related to everyone mention on this website would come our way I received information that (being a smart lawyer) he wanted to sort out this scandal quietly but was instructed by NSW top legal body not to - advice that he unfortunately followed. This decision had cost him his job. On Dec 17 '07 - London DLA PIPER Board 'instructed' Au Foxes Boards of Directors and Mr. STRAHL retired as Chairman. They didn’t like that Mr. STRAHL changed the name to cover company scandal and let 'Piper' pay the bill. Although I do not have too much sympathy for the powerful side of the law who abuse position given and goes against deprived and already discriminated side during the legal proceedings I have to say I found his resignation very upsetting. This man has build a career that everyone should be proud of, work hard every single day for it .. So from this to this that this smart lawyer invested everything he had, I am disappointed by his decision related to my case. Can’t stop thinking what if… He followed his professional instinct and settled this case… Well... WHAT WENT WRONG? Mr. STRAHL didn’t understand the cultural differences. Piper's Board of Directors are based in London. In Europe, we look differently at things like this. Conservative Europe. Reputation is everything. Money, fame, you name it, that means nothing to us All those things you can have it, but don’t touch our reputation Apology, to clear the name - that can’t be put into financial terms. I know people who had sacrifice everything, marriage, children, and future - just to clear the name. I know it’s stupid, I know that all of you will laugh at me, but that is something deeply inside most of us. That was the reason why I tried everything before making complain to contact person in DLA Piper. 10 days later Mr. STRAHL had step-down Despite everything I respect him. I found some high profile cases he was involved and won... Have to admit; He was the lawyer and a half. Such is life EUROPEAN VALUES u ask about European values? DLA PHILLIPS FOX - NEW ZEALAND – CONSULTANT A lot of 'issues' are sort out on the basis on 'the word'. Yes, affidavit is affidavit, court is court.. but in Europe the "given word" - between people who value reputation - is valued far more than any legal document. (as we all know, affidavit could disappear, could be tampered with... or "Its not here, I didn’t see it and I didn’t read it" However when you say to someone; I gave you my word, this issue will be done like that..." There’s no way back. Europeans are open, we are far more trustworthy than any other race at any other continent. But this trust comes with the consequences; once betrayed, there’s no second chance. DLA PIPER - UK (in Europe this legal company is known as LEGAL GIANT, I bet Fox-Guys didn’t know that) phew

SCANDAL- PHILLIPSFOX -SCANDAL- DLA PHILLIPSFOX -SCANDAL- SYDNEY DLAPIPER

DLA PIPER

DLA Piper is one of the largest law firms in the world and it is the only firm with more than 3,500 lawyers in North America and Europe

Their role is not quite clear to me... Theory 1 ; they naively accepted an offer from Sydney Foxes and when I lodge complain the Chairman and our Monica Grace and Samuel were booted out - just to make it clear whos the boss and how the 'real' legal firm deals with the crimes of this nature. To avoid any responsibilitiy Mr Strahl had to go too. Theory 2; Piper knew and willingly offer ed support (not likely). But we dont know and can speculate forever. However both of legal firms were involved in this crime and both of are responsible. How would share this responsibility thats up to them. It was worth to explore this just to see how things going and to have some evidence that I did made a contact with Piper,discussing the damages. done under their name

So for being absolutely sure that NSW doesn’t have the court, the law and order In '08 I made a contact with Court Registrar in UK, London seeking from him to forward my case to UK judge.

I wanted to know is it possible for me to lodge my case in London as Piper was involved and crime had happened under their name (if not involved Foxes would be force to take responsibility) But Piper acted very quickly and very wisely, the following week on the Foxes website in a very small font on the bottom of the page new note was published...DLA Phillips Fox is a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity

Old saying 'WOLF WILL CHANGE THE FUR, BUT THE NATURE? NEVER

DATE November 2010 TO SUPREME COURT The huge bill is paid on my behalf; I feel oblige to thank defendant. Would love to encl amount to let them know how much I appreciate Case no 20372 / 2004 Dear Sir, would you reply to let me know that you have received this email Thank you, Ves
DATE November 2010 FROM SUPREME COURT Yes, received. I will look at the file and let you know. Regards, Supreme Court of New South Wales Ph: (02) 9230 xxxx Fax: (02) 9230 xxxx
DATE November 2010 FROM SUPREME COURT Dear Ms Simundic, I've requested your file and it's buried in the basement somewhere. They haven't found it for me yet which is unfortunate because I won't be here next week. Hopefully by the time I get back to work I'll have the necessary paperwork and be able to answer your enquiry about costs. My apologies. Regards ,supreme.court@agd.nsw.gov.au Supreme Court of New South Wales Ph: (02) 9230 xxxx Fax: (02) 9230 xxxx
DATE November 2010 TO SUPREME COURT What’s happening with the information I ask you for, please? My friends talked with someone in Ombudsman office and they said I shouldn’t have problem to access my information Kindly thank youVes ps I'm concern that Xsmas would come and go and I wouldn't be able to send the Xsmas card with amount paid It would really look very bad as I have a very good relationship with Newcastle University They might think that I do not appreciate their act of kindness Can you do something? Kindly Thankyou Vesna
DATE November 2010 FROM SUPREME COURT Dear Vesna, We have tried very hard to find your file, but I'm afraid it has been lost. The only thing I can tell you is that the University of Newcastle was represented in the case by DLA Phillips Fox Lawyers - their address is level 38, 201 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, NSW 2000. Please accept my apologies for not being able to be of more help to you. Kind regards supreme.court@agd.nsw.gov.au Supreme Court of New South Wales

and the Sydney's DLA PIPER is born

UPDATE january 2011 I already said You can change the name but the nature and the culture NO. Phillips Fox did the crime. They were caught in the ‘act;’ they merged with DLA Piper and changed the name into DLA Phillips Fox. They paid the price though, but the old habits die-hard. My document keeps vanishing but this time under the DLA Phillips Fox and even Supreme Court staff try to distance its name from this ‘Criminal’ Law Firm I have published new allegation against Phillips Fox (DLA Phillips Fox) In the time frame of 2 months new decision has been made; this firm has to disappear. It was obvious; the culture of Phillips Fox, people, customs… cant be fixed so lets wipe it out. From June 2011 this firm will go under the Australian / Sydney DLA PIPER. Well done to Phillips Fox; a very smart move. And to DLA PIPER; Guys hope you’ll not regret it.

TO SERVE AND PROTECT

HON JUSTICE KATHERINE BRANSON QC

NOT TO BE TRUSTED

NEW President & Commissioners Australian Human Rights Former judge of the Federal Court of Australia, the Hon. Catherine Branson QC has been President of the Australian Human Rights Commission since Oct '08.

At the time of her appointment, Hon. Catherine Branson QC was a judge of the Federal Court of Australia. What I think? Ms Branson is corrupt 10 out of 10. After my case we have confiscate her title QC Now she is fondly known as "CC" which stands for Corrupt Cate :)

The jurisdiction of the Federal Court includes jurisdiction to hear and determine complaints alleging unlawful discrimination under Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws.

In 08 Ms Branson was promoted by Spigelman Moved to Supreme Court as an ACTING JUSTICE

Ms Branson moved out from the Supreme Court few weeks after Judge Bathurst took over from Judge Spigelman

CAN U SPOT THE DIFFERENCE?

BEFORE Honorable Judge Kath Branson QC

NOW UnHonorable Judge Kath Branson CC

JUSTICE JAMES ALLSOP

JUDGE ALLSOP PROMOTED AS A CHIEF OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

Former Federal Court Judge Honorable Justices Allsop was appointed the President of the NSW Court of Appeal on June 2, 2008. JUSTICE James ALLSOP is Member of Judicial Commission of NSW

NSW Court of Appeal NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Ms KATE BAKER

JOB I dont know what she is doing now, is she 'punished' like the rest of her buddies, moved to another job or she kept the same one (she is in Gosford far from "crime scene" so that might assist Kate.

Kate was last whos name desapear from AASW website. Thats public 'move' whats happening behind our back...Nobody knows.

Reminiscence... Kate was AASW ethical director who wrote THE CODE OF ETHICS - the same Code and the same Policy that she breached one by one. What a hypocrite

Like Ms Flynn and Ms Gaha in 2009 her name reapeared on AASW website. Well, welcome Kate, we didnt mist you NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Judicial corruption certainly exists in every country and every society from time to time. It undermines the rule of law and saying that judicial body knows exactly how much damage has been done and how hard is to gain peoples trust. The hardest part is how to solve this problem WITHOUT undermining the rule of law. And that is sooooo hard. The rule of law shouldn’t be weaken, lets face it the law is the law... And that’s the problem. It’s a challenge to all governments to eradicate judicial corruption without intruding on the independence of judiciary. What I see; NSW suffer from chronic judicial corruption with the roots so deep.... it will go with a big BANG.
Considering that the most corrupt judge is the Chief Judge Spigelman (shocking!!!) the only way is to convince judge to do the honorable act and resign.
He would save the court as well as the reputation of NSW.
Thats the only option, nothing else would save already damaged NSW legal reputation
About the Judge?
He can’t do much for his own but should do for the country that put so much trust in the (obvious) wrong hands.

 
 
 
The Thief Supreme Court Registar Ms MEEGAN GREENWOOD

Ms Greenwood was in the same category as Ms Beach. Her crimes are unmatched. She would make available all my confidential documents to University Legal Rep through Dla Phillips Fox. She would rewrite, tampered with - with any document I lodged. As long as Mr SPIGELMAN was the Chief Justice of NSW she was safe and free to do whatever she wanted. The crime in the Supreme Court Registry was the norm.

I know this might sound like a cliché but in my wildest dreams I couldn’t imagine the crimes she has done and how low this Registrar was willing to go. I found distressing just to think about it. Being labelled as clinically disturbed and ‘danger to myself and to others’ I had to be extra consciousness of my appearance and behaviour in the Registry. This I found extremely challenging in presence of Ms Greenwood as her manipulative nature would used any onset of anger on my side to accuse me of being ‘out of place ‘. In the same time I had to ‘politely’ witness her criminal acts and behaviour, gather evidence against her like ‘nothing happens’ and .. I was good in that. Actually I was so good in never-ever acting angry or frustrated that many times I felt she genuinely felt sorry for me regardless to how ‘intellectually limited’ I was. She was clearly enjoying my helplessness right till my last day in Court. I will remember Ms Greenwood as a criminal with no class or dignity. Ms Beach was far better. Ms Beach was Pro.

ON FIRST JUNE HON MR BATHURST HAS TAKEN OVER AS A NSW NEW CHIEF JUDGE. A FEW DAYS LATER MS GREENWOOD WAS GONE, TO MUCH CRIMES RESULTED IN PEOPLE TURNING IN HUNDREDS AWAY FROM THE SUPREME COURT. THE FEAR OF SEEKENG JUSTICE KNOWING WHAT COURT CAN DO TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY WAS SOMETHING NSW SUPREME COURT HAD TO DEAL WITH. AND AGAIN, IT WASN'T TOO MUCH ABOUT US - IT WAS ABOUT NSW SUPREME COURT JUDGES OWN FINANCICAL SURVIVAL.